Re: Booting from raid0g?

[Stephen Borrill <netbsd%precedence.co.uk@localhost>]

On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Hauke Fath wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:15:33 +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > I use this entry in boot.cfg:
> >
> > menu=Boot alternate:multiboot netbsd console=com console_speed=57600
> > root=raid0h
>
> Hm - would this load the kernel from raid0a, or from the alternate
> partition (raid0h in your case)?

Technically, it won't be loading from raid anything. It'll boot from drive 
0 with a filesystem offset at 64 sectors after the usual start of wd0a. 
So for instance, if RAIDframe has failed the wd0 component of raid0 and 
you update the kernel, you'll end up booting the old kernel as wd0 won't 
have been updated.

--
Stephen