Re: State of ZFS?

To: "netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost List" <netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: State of ZFS?
From: Dustin Marquess <dmarquess%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:13:04 -0500

I'd be perfectly happy if just the zvol part was up-to-date and stable. It would help fill the void of a Xen dom0 hosting domU's on zvols that Oracle created.

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost> wrote:

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:18:12AM -0400, David Wetzel wrote:
> how is the state of netbsd's ZFS vs the ZFS in FreeBSD 9.2?
> How is support for SSDs?

Not usable unfortunately. It needs work on both ZFS and the generic
vnode layer in NetBSD as far as I know.

Kind regards

--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of ZFS?
  - From: John Nemeth

References:
- State of ZFS?
  - From: David Wetzel
- Re: State of ZFS?
  - From: Matthias Scheler

Prev by Date: Re: cannot configure X in 6.1.2
Next by Date: Re: cannot configure X in 6.1.2
Previous by Thread: Re: State of ZFS?
Next by Thread: Re: State of ZFS?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index