NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Frustrating network latency issue on NetBSD 6.1

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:53:42AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Use ping, not ssh, to be able to have a more isolated test case and get
> quantitative data.  In particular, separate loss from delay; both
> present as delay over TCP.
64 bytes from icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=6.781 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.283 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.982 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=4.147 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.320 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.520 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.993 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.595 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.951 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2.224 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.960 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=3.283 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1.937 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=2.325 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=1.960 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=1.965 ms
----router PING Statistics----
25 packets transmitted, 16 packets received, 36.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.937/2.639/6.781/1.253 ms

I think 36% is a large number for packet loss?

How can this be checked further?

Actually my main router is not DD-WRT. It runs proprietary firmware (Lava
W150). I was using WRT160NL DD-WRT more as a range extender. But to reduce
the variables, currently I am directly connecting to the main router.
where I don't have a way to examine the packets.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index