Re: Why NetBSD still use CVS?

[Dave Huang <khym%azeotrope.org@localhost>]

On Dec 19, 2012, at 14:59, Sad Clouds 
<cryintothebluesky%googlemail.com@localhost> wrote:

> I'm curious, why NetBSD still use CVS and not moved to "better" tools
> like Subversion or Git?
> 
> I keep reading about how tools like Git were designed to solve
> serious flaws of CVS. If CVS is flawed (e.g. non-atomic commits) then
> why use it?


FYI, there's a tech-repository%netbsd.org@localhost mailing list about moving 
to 
other version control systems (list archives at 
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-repository/tindex.html). There 
doesn't seem to be much recent discussion though… however, apparently 
the CVS repo has been converted to both Git and Fossil.
-- 
Name: Dave Huang         |  Mammal, mammal / their names are called /
INet: khym%azeotrope.org@localhost |  they raise a paw / the bat, the cat /
FurryMUCK: Dahan         |  dolphin and dog / koala bear and hog -- TMBG
Dahan: Hani G Y+C 37 Y++ L+++ W- C++ T++ A+ E+ S++ V++ F- Q+++ P+ B+ PA+ PL++