Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

To: NetBSD <netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
From: Petar Bogdanovic <petar%smokva.net@localhost>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:31:51 +0100

On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 04:20:34AM -0800, kellyremo wrote:
>
>  My question is: So Why Does the original OpenSSH has "limited
>  statically defined internal flow control buffers"?? It could be way
>  faster, even 10x!!

netbsd-5 has hpn-ssh:

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2010/06/12/msg006397.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2010/06/13/msg006406.html

                Petar Bogdanovic

References:
- OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
  - From: kellyremo

Prev by Date: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
Next by Date: Re: IPMI SOL and console baud rate
Previous by Thread: Re: OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
Next by Thread: sysutils/xfce4-thunar fails
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index