[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Definition of NetBSD users
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > I am not sure how FreeBSD exceeds NetBSD for desktop systems. Please
> > explain and share examples.
> They have working, stable, performant 3D drivers for NVidia cards. 3D
> on NetBSD is limited to the opensource AMD drivers, which still lack a
Proprietary drivers. See today's announcement from Nvidia:
The latest FreeBSD driver license is at:
- Can't have multiple backups.
- May not be used concurrently on different computers.
- Linux version allows redistribution, but FreeBSD is NOT Linux!
- No reverse engineering.
- You must use all components (can't separate or exclude).
- Can't rent out your system.
This ties into the other comments in this thread that I agree with:
"proprietary technologies shouldn't even be thought about in this
> For a modern desktop, you really need 3D acceleration, as users
> expect stuff like Compiz etc.
I guess I don't fully understand and realize what I am missing :)
What exactly is this feature or benefit that users "expect"? I assume
that something very noticable but I don't notice myself when watching
videos or using my desktop without 3D acceleration. Note I don't watch
videos often nor do I play any 3D games, so maybe I am not a good
example of what to expect regarding this. I don't have anything to
compare with to realize what I am missing. Examples would be great.
Main Index |
Thread Index |