[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:03:03PM +0300, Jukka Marin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:11:20AM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> > At 16:14 Uhr -0400 02.06.2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > >If I were you I would first get rid of "-X" -- it's not listed as stable
> > >and I've never even tried it. It may be a nice idea in theory, but....
> > Huh? Are you sure you got that option right? Binaries that run in
> > Linux emulation will fail when they access an NFS share otherwise, as
> > I can confirm first-hand.
> Yep, that's why I'm using -X.
That option never caused a problem for me.
My NetBSD NFS servers works very well for me, definitely much better
than the Linux NFS server at work.
The only problem I have a the moment is caused by amd(8) under high
load (see PR bin/41259). That does however cause random failures
to access files and not hangs.
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |