NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: state or future of LFS?

Am Freitag 10 April 2009 schrieb Wouter Klouwen:
> Some of the other FSs incorporate features with logging, but it's not LFS.
> WAPBL may do what you want, though there are still some issues with it.

Ok, yes - i've heard about WAPBL a little, but doesnt tried yet productive. So 
i will take further look on it.

Is there any roadmap to make WAPBL hard enough for productive usage? Is there 
anyone who is still using this on loaded machines over longer periods? What 
is about the performance?

many thanks to you all here, for this (really ~ß) nice os.
Have a nice easter weekend,


btw: waiting for a open cellphone with a (open source) netbsd on it... ~ß)


  Niels Dettenbach
  Syndicat IT&Internet
  T.-Muentzer.-Str. 2, 37308 Heilbad Heiligenstadt - DE
  PGP public key ID 651CA20D
  Fingerprint: 55E0 4DCD B04C 4A49 1586  88AE 54DC 4465 651C A20D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index