NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: misc/59474 (BIND9 admin ref manual missing. (From /usr/share/doc/reference/ref8/bind9/arm/))
The following reply was made to PR misc/59474; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dave B <pr%netbsd.dberg.net@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: misc-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, gutteridge%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: misc/59474 (BIND9 admin ref manual missing. (From
/usr/share/doc/reference/ref8/bind9/arm/))
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:24:17 -0400
Thanks for asking, Dave.
Yeah, that's what I was afraid of. I was personally a big fan of
when those docs were right in the NetBSD distribution sets (it was
one of a number of things that help make NetBSD feel a little like
a secret weapon in one's toolbox to me); and I think it would be
great to see them there again someday.
That said, I'm not sure it would be right to ask to keep another
long-term PR open as basically a to-do list item (i.e., for "figure
out how to miraculously build the BIND docs as part of building a
NetBSD release--when certain needed tools don't exist in Base"),
especially with no clear path forward. If it IS right, I'm not
opposed to keeping the ticket open of course; but if it isn't
right, I understand it might be best to close it.
Miscellaneous parting thoughts:
- is this a possible NetBSD Projects List candidate? (cons:
even if someone figures out how to build the docs, what about
Base's still not having python & other necessary tools...).
- is it viable to build the docs at BIND9 import time (assuming
the right tools in pkgsrc or w/e), rather than build release
time, and track them in cvsroot/src? (cons: extra drag at
import time... extra bloat in /src...?)
Okay, I appreciate all your help.
Best, -DB
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index