NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-alpha/55545: /usr/src/build.sh script only known alpha/alpha, but my machnine is EV56



The following reply was made to PR port-alpha/55545; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Fazekas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mih=E1ly?= <michael%telkp.bme.hu@localhost>
To: port-alpha-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, 
	gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-alpha/55545: /usr/src/build.sh script only known
 alpha/alpha, but my machnine is EV56
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 13:08:29 +0200

 On Aug 8, 2020, at 4:15 PM, David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > > > wrote:
 > > 
 > > > How can i compile src for ev56 cpu?
 > > 
 > > Is it not an alpha? Does the -m alpha -a alpha build not work?
 > 
 > I think what's being suggested is that it would be nice to say "I
 > want code optimized for this specific Alpha".  In general, we do not
 > provide that w/ build.sh, but it could be done with mk.conf variables
 > to set COPTS accordingly.
 > 
 Yes. :-)
 
 "My history" (started at middle of 2020 may):
 GENERIC: use 1 CPU, see 4 CPU, offical install set:
 no hangup
 
 GENERIC.MP with 1 CPU (only cpu0 slot is used):
 no problem
 
 GENERIC.MP use more than one CPU, offical install set:
 terrible/road to hell/....
 (some situation parallel running commands, guaratee hangup
 whitin 2-5 minute,
 example: fetch src by cvs, and etract pkgsrc for tarball)
 
 
 With my custom (MP) kernel config(s):
 Remove some unwanted line from GENERIC.MP: better than generic config
 
 Remove ALL unwanted line (bluetooth, usb, EISA cards,
 kernelized raid, many pseudo devices,...),
 and set CPUFLAGS="-mbwx -mcpu=ev56": more better,
 and detectable faster. Ok, speeup less than 2..3x,
 but speed diff. "human detectable", and no too much hangup,
 if use only one session: compress/decompress/fetch_by_cvs/compile
 (compile: make without -j option),...: can compile entrie system
 without hangup....
 My latest custom kernel config:
 http://www.telkp.bme.hu/as4k1/AS4K1_V1
 
 
 Less hangup count if add 2 line at end of my custom kernel config:
 no options SCHED_4BSD
 options SCHED_M2
 
 At now: first readable (captureable) message arrived
 after more than 2 month (frozen at this screen):
 http://www.telkp.bme.hu/as4k1/20200810_120031.jpg
 
 
 My (current) hardware in alphaserver box:
 AlphaServer 4100, 4x CPU (21164A-2, 600MHz), 8G ram, S3 Trio,
 3x Mylex D960, 1x QLogic 1020 scsi, 1x 3Com 905B ethernet,
 1x SMC 9342TX.
 (ex0: internal net address, sshd listen on this,
 epic0: external address only for outgoing connections)
 
 
 Other things:
 Hangap can reproduce with any combination of my CPU modules,
 and my memory modules.
 Hangup can reproduce under 2 CPU,
 with only one QLogic 1020 scsi controller.
 
 
 Ineresting:
 Install OpenVMS, and Tru64Unix to sd0 and sd1
 (names under SRM console: dka100 and dka300).
 With full hardware (4x CPU, 8G ram) under Tru64Unix:
 cannot reproduce hangup!
 
 With SRM console builtin tests: no problem!
 
 
 "My tests" wich can hangup under NetBSD,
 and cannot hangup under Tru64Unix (with 4x CPU):
 
 Test1: copy raw device to image. Image placed on remote.
 (dd if=/dev/sd0 of=/remote_dir/imgae.img)
 "Same result" when copy big file via scp (ssh copy).
 
 Test2: dd if=/dev/sd0 count=...|gzip -c9 >/dev/null
 On GENERIC.MP: hangup (8-9 of 10 test)
 On my (latest) custom kernel: no hangup if no
 other session is running
 On True64Unix (logically same command): no hangup (0 of 10).
 
 
 All of my pci cards (used in my alphaserver) tested
 in PC (IBM eServer from 2001 (x200 series?)).
 
 
 I'm idiot?   Possible..... :-)
 
 -- 
 mailto:michael%telkp.bme.hu@localhost
 phone:+36-1-463-1966
 



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index