Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: FFSv2ea
Hello Clay,
On 17.01.23 03:27, Clay Daniels wrote:
I've enjoyed trying out the new 10.0_BETA and I've selected the newer
FFSv2ea from the partition menu of the installation a couple of times.
If I try this: #gpt show wd0
I get this: GPT part - NetBSD FFSv1/FFSv2
Then the next installation I deliberately used the default of FFSv2, I
get the same thing. I'm sure I must be expecting the gpt command to do
more than it really does. What other commands shows the fast file system
in use?
Clay
the output of gpt corresponds to the GPT partition type. This is rather
generic in my opinion - you can see that FFSv1 and FFSv2 seem to share a
code here.
More precise information about the contents of the FFS file system
internally can provide the command dumpfs. Attention: this only works on
unmounted partitions. For example, it also shows the subtype FFSV2ea.
Here is an example:
```
$ doas dumpfs /dev/dk2 | head
file system: /dev/dk2
format FFSv2ea
endian little-endian
location 65536 (-b 128)
magic 19012038 time Mon Jan 16 16:32:12 2023
superblock location 65536 id [ 63010452 50c5903c ]
nbfree 5327255 ndir 12306 nifree 16432093 nffree 1132
ncg 354 size 67108855 blocks 66069485
bsize 32768 shift 15 mask 0xffff8000
fsize 4096 shift 12 mask 0xfffff000
frag 8 shift 3 fsbtodb 3
bpg 23697 fpg 189576 ipg 46720
minfree 5% optim time maxcontig 2 maxbpg 4096
symlinklen 120 contigsumsize 2
maxfilesize 0x000800800805ffff
nindir 4096 inopb 128
avgfilesize 16384 avgfpdir 64
sblkno 24 cblkno 32 iblkno 40 dblkno 2960
sbsize 4096 cgsize 32768
csaddr 2960 cssize 8192
cgrotor 0 fmod 0 ronly 0 clean 0x01
wapbl version 0x1 location 2 flags 0x0
wapbl loc0 268463360 loc1 131072 loc2 512 loc3 3
usrquota 0 grpquota 0
flags none
fsmnt /export
```
However, it is reasonable to ask whether the reasons that led to the
introduction of the new FFSV2 subtype ea would also require a standalone
GPT partition type, or whether the current status is still ok, since
nothing has changed in the basic on disk format of the filesystems. Here
I do not know however the guidelines. Maybe Chuck can answer that?
Kind regards
Matthias
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index