Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"

To: "John D. Baker" <jdbaker%consolidated.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
From: Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 13:40:43 +0100

"John D. Baker" <jdbaker%consolidated.net@localhost> wrote:
> Well, 3 out of 4 kernels built when the above procedure was followed.
> the following config still fails when the old DRM drivers are enabled:

Your RACKMOUNT config builds fine for me (apart from plip but I will fix
that), are you sure that the link errors you are seeing are from the
kernel and not from a module?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
  - From: John D. Baker

References:
- Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
  - From: John D. Baker

Prev by Date: Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
Next by Date: Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
Previous by Thread: Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
Next by Thread: Re: legacy DRM UMS vs. "options DRM_LEGACY"
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index