Hej, > Am 21.07.2022 um 09:49 schrieb Mayuresh <mayuresh%acm.org@localhost>: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 08:17:08AM +0200, Matthias Petermann wrote: >> At the moment, I only encounter the described problem when I select the AMD >> variant. Mayuresh, can you confirm this? > > I did observe this. But they said the following (pasted on the thread > before) > > <quote> > Most of our Systems and all AMD Hosts already use Q35 as default virtual > chipset. It seems like you had luck to get a CX (Intel) Host that still > uses i440FX. > </quote> I ran into this problem today, since helsinki ran out of intel servers. > > The way I interpret: > > AMD => Q35 > > Intel => some i440FX and some Q35. > > You are 'lucky' if you find host that 'still' uses i440FX => some intel > have i440FX, though eventually all will have Q35. What is the problem with Q35, i mean, is there a plan to support that virtual chipset? I noticed FreeBSD boots just fine. Whereas, the 9.2 ISO just does not find disks (and network, as far as I can tell). And cloning 9.99.95 just panics (syscall (number 5). while trying cnopen(). Besides - does anyone know how to get the output of the virtual console copied? > > In my limited experiments I did not find Intel with Q35 though. > > On request, they reconfigure it to i440FX, which is what helped me set up > AMD. I tried that, will see if they will do that (and when). But that is not really a viable solution since I tended to delete and recreate servers there. Which is no at least not instanteneously possible when support is needed for every setup. Cheers Oskar
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature