Re: Jemalloc fallout on sandpoint

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <f8c7bfd44f92a1e32f1f953697757e24%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>,
Robert Swindells  <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
>On 2019-04-09 01:26, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>>> On Apr 8, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Julian Coleman <jdc%coris.org.uk@localhost> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Upgraded my QNAP TS-201 (sandpoint) to current, and all binaries crash 
>>> with:
>> 
>> What kind of CPU is in this device?  It's possible that jemalloc is
>> making a page size assumption that isn't true for this particular
>> powerpc CPU (I think there were other issues like this on another
>> port...).
>
>Do powerpc kernels have a sysctl for page size ? I'm fairly sure that 
>arm does.

It is better I think if it is a constant.

christos