Re: incomplete obsolescence of "viadrm"

[Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>]

While we're on the subject of viadrm, I noticed that it was removed from 
the amd64 GENERIC and ALL configs.

Since one of the premises of removal was that viadrmums was a suitable 
replacement, shouldn't that have been added to the relevant configs?


On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, John D. Baker wrote:

> Following the removal of "viadrm" from sources and i386 GENERIC and ALL
> configs, the module form is only being obsoleted and removed from:
>
>  /stand/i386/8.99.21/modules/viadrm/viadrm.kmod
>
> and its immediate parent directory.
>
> There are two other instances which are not being accounted for:
>
>  /stand/i386-xen/8.99.21/modules/viadrm/viadrm.kmod
>  /stand/i386pae-xen/8.99.21/modules/viadrm/viadrm.kmod
>
> Following the latest 'postinstall ... fix obsolete', only the first
> instance was removed while the other two were left intact.
>
> --
> |/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS               NetBSD     Darwin/MacOS X
> |\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com    OpenBSD            FreeBSD
> | X  No HTML/proprietary data in email.   BSD just sits there and works!
> |/ \ GPGkeyID:  D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4  BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645
>
>
> !DSPAM:5b46ae64281411907016811!

+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:          |
| (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com   |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+