Re: raidframe oddity

[Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost>]

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:51:20PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:38:20AM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > No spares.
> > Component label for /dev/dk17:
> >    Row: 1, Column: 3, Num Rows: 0, Num Columns: 0
> >    Version: 3865, Serial Number: 0, Mod Counter: 0
> >    Clean: Yes, Status: 1
> >    sectPerSU: 1, SUsPerPU: 53, SUsPerRU: 100
> >    Queue size: -387938304, blocksize: -387938208, numBlocks: 3865
> >    RAID Level: ^@
> >    Autoconfig: Yes
> >    Root partition: No
> >    Last configured as: raid0
> > 
> > 
> > Interesting queue size... (and raid level)
> 
> Many raidframe ioctls got versioned, how old is your raidctl? (If old, 
> please keep it so we can fix the emulation ;-})

# ls -l `which raidctl`
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  36320 Mar 17 08:38 /sbin/raidctl

By ancient, I meant it wasn't a new raid. That raid 5 was in that box
for a while, and that box follows -current/amd64. So, it was created
with an older raidctl. (Not sure I should start worrying that I don't
see the cgd on it yet or not...)

Cheers,

Patrick