Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Possible regression in wm(4)?
Hello. That's good news. I'll second that the patch worked
perfectly.
-thanks
-Brian
On Dec 7, 9:40am, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
} Subject: Re: Possible regression in wm(4)?
} On 2017/12/06 22:26, Bert Kiers wrote:
} > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:40:37PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
} >> Hi, all
} >>
} >> On 2017/11/22 0:21, Bert Kiers wrote:
} >>> Hi,
} >>>
} >>> A different computer with the same type motherboard has the same
} >>> problem. A quad I350 (also wm(4)) works fine (with GENERIC netbsd-8
} >>> kernel).
} >>>
} >>> Still wondering what queue drops are.
} >>>
} >>> Grtnx,
} >>
} >> Could you test the following diff?
} >
} > Yes! Works!
} > Thank you!
}
} Thanks. The diff have been committed now and will be pulled
} up to netbsd-8.
}
} --
} -----------------------------------------------
} SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
} msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)
>-- End of excerpt from Masanobu SAITOH
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index