On 19.02.2017 02:42, Rin Okuyama wrote: > On 2017/02/19 4:49, Jaromír Doleček wrote: >> 2017-02-18 19:09 GMT+01:00 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>: >>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote: >>>> Sure, the first is easier. For the second we need icu in base >>>> (http://site.icu-project.org/). We could discuss the second in >>>> tech-userlevel. >>> >>> No ICU in base. Just no. >> >> I share this sentiment, too. >> >> Do we use the bind-bundled idnkit for our bind build? Possibly we can >> reuse the same for the postfix code too, if it's good enough for bind >> it should be good enough for postfix. >> >> It would be a shame to have smptutf8 just disabled. > > Hmm, at the first sight, postfix uses ICU for two purposes: > > (1) ASCII/UTF-8 domain name conversion > (2) casefold UTF-8 text for caseless comparison > > (1) can be replaced by idnkit if someone writes wrapper functions. > (2) seems to be lacking from idnkit. We probably can write stripped- > down version of that function, derived from ICU. > > Anyhow, it needs some work to enable smptutf8... > > Thanks, > rin Right now ICU is the only library I'm missing in the base. If there are good alternatives to go, I would be satisfied as well.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature