Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: postfix 3.1.4 imported in current

On 19.02.2017 02:42, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> On 2017/02/19 4:49, Jaromír Doleček wrote:
>> 2017-02-18 19:09 GMT+01:00 Joerg Sonnenberger <>:
>>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>>> Sure, the first is easier. For the second we need icu in base
>>>> ( We could discuss the second in
>>>> tech-userlevel.
>>> No ICU in base. Just no.
>> I share this sentiment, too.
>> Do we use the bind-bundled idnkit for our bind build? Possibly we can
>> reuse the same for the postfix code too, if it's good enough for bind
>> it should be good enough for postfix.
>> It would be a shame to have smptutf8 just disabled.
> Hmm, at the first sight, postfix uses ICU for two purposes:
> (1) ASCII/UTF-8 domain name conversion
> (2) casefold UTF-8 text for caseless comparison
> (1) can be replaced by idnkit if someone writes wrapper functions.
> (2) seems to be lacking from idnkit. We probably can write stripped-
> down version of that function, derived from ICU.
> Anyhow, it needs some work to enable smptutf8...
> Thanks,
> rin

Right now ICU is the only library I'm missing in the base. If there are
good alternatives to go, I would be satisfied as well.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index