Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: More questions concerning module dependencies
Adding tech-kern, and clarifying the first sentence...
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Paul Goyette wrote:
For some reason, the "drmkms" module has an explicit dependency for module
"iic" yet it does not have any unresolved symbols.
"drmkms" doesn't have any unresolved symbols _that would be resovled in
module "iic"
Module "drmkms" also depends on module "drmkms_linux". drmkms_linux _does_
have symbol references that would be resolved from module "i2cexec" and yet
there is no dependency listed.
It seems to me that we should remove the dependency on "iic" from "drmkms",
and we should add a dependency on "i2cexec" to "drmkms_linux".
Comments?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index