Re: pf--?

[bch <brad.harder%gmail.com@localhost>]

isn't npf a bit young to be named in the same breath as ipfilter and
pf ? I'm not criticizing, but it seems a bit early to use it as an
argument for nixing pf. Happy to be persuaded I'm incorrect...

-bch


On 1/16/15, Thomas Klausner <tk%giga.or.at@localhost> wrote:
> Is there still much point in keeping pf(4) in NetBSD now that we have
> npf(4) (and also ipfilter(4))?
>
> The last time it was updated was, according to the CHANGES files, in
> 2008, to the version coming with OpenBSD 4.2.
>  Thomas
>