Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

fts_open() not behaving properly re: PHYSICAL/LOGICAL flags?

To: current-users <current-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: fts_open() not behaving properly re: PHYSICAL/LOGICAL flags?
From: B Harder <brad.harder%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:12:12 -0700

It seems I can fts_open() w/o supplying either of, (or supplying both
of) FTS_PHYSICAL and FTS_LOGICAL. The man page (FTS(3)) repeatedly
says "Either FST_LOGICAL or FTS_PHYSICAL _must_ be provided"

I can supply 0 as a flag, or FTS_LOGICAL|FTS_PHYSICAL, and no error is
set (assuming would receive NULL FTS*).

Can anybody comment on what I'm seeing here?

-bch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fts_open() not behaving properly re: PHYSICAL/LOGICAL flags?
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
Next by Date: Re: kernel panic on a cold start amd64.(msk0 and bridge problem).
Previous by Thread: daily CVS update output
Next by Thread: Re: fts_open() not behaving properly re: PHYSICAL/LOGICAL flags?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index