Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure

To: current-users%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
From: David Holland <dholland-current%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 03:42:45 +0000

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:43:49AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
 > sbin/fsck_lfs/utilities.c:#include "fsutil.h"
 > 
 > All of those except for lfs.c have been there for years. Anyone want
 > to suggest what's different about lfs.c?

yeah, what's different is that it's .PATH'd in by lfs_cleanerd.

grmbl.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
  - From: NetBSD Test Fixture
- Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
Next by Date: Re: RFC: mpsafe bridge and NIC drivers (vioif and wm)
Previous by Thread: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
Next by Thread: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index