Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Another 6.99.31 amd64 panic



Nope,  same with
http://nyftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/HEAD/201402240050Z/amd64/binary/kernel/netbsd-GENERIC.gz

(  same with slight change in the addresses ).

....
boot device: raid0
root on raid0a dumps on raid0b
root file system type: ffs
uvm_fault(0xfffffe8006d1be60, 0x0, 1) -> e
uvm_fault(0xfffffe8006d1be60, 0x0, 1) -> e
fatal page fault in supervisor mode
trap type 6 code 0 rip ffffffff807d3d3b cs 8 rflags 10246 cr2 0 ilevel
0 rsp fffffe8006d097b0
curlwp 0xfffffe8006d2ea00 pid 1.1 lowest kstack 0xfffffe8006d06280
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped in pid 1.1 (init) at   netbsd:trap+0x99b:      movzwl   0(%rax),%eax
db{1}> bt
trap() at netbsdL:trap+0x9c8
--- trap (number 6) ---
?() at 0
execve_loadvm() at netbsd:execve_loadvm+0x1db
execve1() at netbsd:execve1+0x2d
start_init() at netbsd:start_init+0x2a7
db{1}>
...

On 21 February 2014 20:32, David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:34PM +0000, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
>> The panic still takes place with 6.99.32 from the overnight build.
>
> Something must be different about your build (or system).
> Any guesses.
>
> The first address printed for the faulting %rip is the one that is
> most likely to be right.
>
>         David
>
> --
> David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost



-- 
----


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index