Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, Patrick Welche wrote:
Maybe I had better be more explicit:
$ ls
one three two
$ ls | more
.
.
.
$
That is very "different"...
What does "ls -1" give?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
- Re: updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
- Re: updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
- Re: updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
- Re: updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
- Re: updates to ls(1), output, and Emacs "dired" mode
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index