Re: Question regarding build.sh for evbarm

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Matt Thomas wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I notice that even though there are so many variants of evbarm, they
>>> all seem to use the same $RELEASEDIR when doing a 'build.sh release'
>>> even though they have separate $OBJDIR and $DESTDIR.
>>> 
>>> Woud it not make sense to put the release files into separate
>>> directories, too?
>> 
>> I do that in my local builds.
>> 
>> It's why I added $RELEASEMACHINEDIR.
> 
> Is there a reason not to enable it automatically?

I added it years ago and I didn't want to change the default behavior.
I never use -a but the machince/arch alias (e.g. evbearmv7hf-el) and
use that for MACHINE and RELEASEMACHINEDIR.