Re: evbcf (coldfire) build is broken

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:02:32AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
> 
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:23 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> 
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:21:16PM -0400, Dennis Ferguson wrote:
> >> While looking for something to compile a tree with some m68k bits
> >> added I found that a successful build of evbcf needs the changes
> >> below.  The problems seem related to the binutils changes.
> > 
> > Can you please provide a bit more details? I'm a bit puzzled how
> > -fommit-frame-pointer would interfere with new binutils (and if it
> > does, isn't that a gcc bug we should fix instead)?
> 
> This is a gcc bug.  I'm assuming that __asm & unwind-tables don't mix.

No, the problem is that doesn't want to create unwind tables without
having a frame pointer at hand. It is a GCC bug, but more a case of
incomplete code generation...

Joerg