Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: evbcf (coldfire) build is broken
On 9 Oct, 2013, at 04:23 , Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:21:16PM -0400, Dennis Ferguson wrote:
>> While looking for something to compile a tree with some m68k bits
>> added I found that a successful build of evbcf needs the changes
>> below. The problems seem related to the binutils changes.
>
> Can you please provide a bit more details? I'm a bit puzzled how
> -fommit-frame-pointer would interfere with new binutils (and if it
> does, isn't that a gcc bug we should fix instead)?
That's fair, but I'm not sure I can answer that with any authority. My
correction only causes coldfire machines to be treated like other m68k
machines were already being treated, and I'm pretty sure this part is
right.
I did notice that removal of -fomit-frame-pointer for those architectures
was a recent change, however, and the build errors for evbcf looked like
this:
# compile ld.elf_so/mdreloc.o
/build/evbcf/obj/tooldir.NetBSD-6.99.24-amd64/bin/m5407--netbsdelf-gcc -O1
-fvisibility=hidden -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fstack-protector
-Wstack-protector --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -msoft-float -std=gnu99 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare
-Wno-traditional -Wa,--fatal-warnings -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wshadow
-Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare
-Wsign-compare -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-zero-length -Wno-uninitialized -Werror
--sysroot=/build/evbcf/obj/destdir.evbcf -fpic -DELFSIZE=32
-DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -D_PATH_RTLD=\"/libexec/ld.elf_so\"
-I/usr/src/libexec/ld.elf_so -I. -DRTLD_LOADER -D_RTLD_SOURCE -DCOMBRELOC
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c /usr/src/libexec/ld.elf_so/arch/m68k/mdreloc.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/libexec/ld.elf_so/arch/m68k/mdreloc.c:1:0: error: unwind tables
currently require a frame pointer for correctness
*** [mdreloc.o] Error code 1
so it seems like something is now issuing a warning when it would previously
just let you do something which was unreliable.
Dennis Ferguson
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index