Re: libatf still broken

To: Julio Merino <julio%meroh.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: libatf still broken
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:13:51 -0400

On Jul 12,  3:32pm, julio%meroh.net@localhost (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: libatf still broken

| I don't understand your fix.  The comment says that libatf-c++ needs
| libstdc++, which is obvious.  But where does the libm dependency come from?
|  Is it an indirect dependency through libstdc++?

Yes, perhaps I should delete the libm mention.

christos

Prev by Date: Re: libatf still broken
Next by Date: build.sh ... distribution failed
Previous by Thread: Re: libatf still broken
Next by Thread: build.sh ... distribution failed
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index