Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Fixing pool_cache_invalidate(9), final step

On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:34:06AM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> [General]
> - Dumped pool_cache_invalidate_cpu() in favor of pool_cache_xcall()
> which transfers CPU-bound objects back to the global pool.
> - Adapt comments accordingly.

pool_cache_xcall() seems to describe how the function works rather than
what it does.  Is it a new part of the pool_cache(9) API?  If so, I
think that the name should say what the function does.


David Young    Urbana, IL    (217) 721-9981

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index