Re: 800+ test failures on i386 (and amd64)

[Nicolas Joly <njoly%pasteur.fr@localhost>]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:19:35PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:34:27AM -0500, Gary Duzan wrote:
> > =>Yesterday, the automated tests on babylon5 ran to completion for the
> > =>first time in more than a week.
> > =>
> > =>The previous completed i386 test run, with 2012.02.27.01.39.58
> > =>sources, had two failures (not counting "expected" ones).  The latest
> > =>one, with 2012.03.04.18.15.35 sources, has 837.
> > =>
> > =>The HTML summary of the failed tests is at:
> > =>
> > =>  
> > http://releng.netbsd.org/b5reports/i386/build/2012.03.04.18.15.35/test.html#failed-tcs-summary
> > =>
> > =>The sparc tests seem to be unaffected by this breakage; amd64 tests
> > =>are still running.
> > 
> >    amd64 has similar test breakage.
> > 
> > http://www.whooppee.com/~paul/amd64-results/3482_atf.html#failed-tcs-summary
> 
> I guess the problem is that RUMP got broken by the recent ELF changes.

No. That's the STATIC_QC_POOL_COUNT change from the following commit
which broke rump ...

      http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2012/03/04/msg032493.html

Lars, can you have a look please.

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Projects and Developments in Bioinformatics
Institut Pasteur, Paris.