Re: raidframe with R5/RS not reconstructing?

[Greg Oster <oster%cs.usask.ca@localhost>]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:13:44 -0800
buhrow%lothlorien.nfbcal.org@localhost (Brian Buhrow) wrote:

>       hello.  Ok. I apologize for the confusion.  So, this bug was
> introduced with the fixes for supporting 1TB+ sized disks? 

Correct.

> I guess
> that would make sense.

Ya.. a I know what needs to happen.. I just need to figure out the
right way to make it happen...

Later...

Greg Oster

> On Feb 16,  3:36pm, Greg Oster wrote:
> } Subject: Re: raidframe with R5/RS not reconstructing?
> } On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:27:31 -0800
> } buhrow%lothlorien.nfbcal.org@localhost (Brian Buhrow) wrote:
> } 
> } >   One of the implications of Greg's analysis is that this
> bug } > doesn't exist in any raidframe code which predates Jed's map
> } > changes.  So, John, I think this means you could boot a 5.0
> kernel, } > rebuild your raid set , then boot a 5.1 kernel and run
> with a fully } > capable raid set until Greg comes up with the proper
> fix. } 
> } No...  Jed's stuff is totally separate from this...  You'd need to
> run } something that pre-dates netbsd-5, so unfortunately, your
> suggestion } will not work... (May 19, 2008 is when the changes that
> included } this bug went in...)
> } 
> } Later...
> } 
> } Greg Oster
> >-- End of excerpt from Greg Oster
>