Re: Build failures on kernel version changes

[Nicolas Joly <njoly%pasteur.fr@localhost>]

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 07:29:54AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> > Or something with the version in it instead of /dev/null? Then it
> > won't slow down; instead it will accumulate old copies over time but
> > they aren't big enough to matter much.
> 
> I like this!

Except that both gcc and binutils explicitely disallow passing user
specified cache file to subconfigures, except for special value
/dev/null (which is the default for top-level configure and disable
caching).

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Projects and Developments in Bioinformatics
Institut Pasteur, Paris.