Re: UDL driver X11 support

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

> did you all really see cvs log?
> there is a (part of) code for supporting X11, and it is commented out 
> for now.

Hmm, probably I should have quoted log in my first post..

http://mail-index.NetBSD.org/source-changes/2009/11/30/msg003732.html

>> * ioctl() for X server support is currently commented out. ("notyet")
>>   OpenBSD allows device depedent ioctl()s and they introduced
>>   UDLIO_DAMAGE ioctl for the damage extension ops of X servers for udl(4).
>>   Before blindly pulling such ioctl(), probably we should discuss
>>   how such specific operations should be handled in MI wscons(4) API.

---
Izumi Tsutsui