Re: Build break - commaizenumber

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:54:58AM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:23:38AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > 
> > >What's wrong with %'<format>?
> > 
> > Nothing!  :)
> > 
> > IMHo, the commaize_number changes including those in ls(1) should be 
> > backed out.
> 
> hmm... the printf man page I was looking at didn't have a mention of that.
> 
> Why should the change to ls be backed out?  Is there something wrong with
> displaying the sizes with commas?

The libc part should be reverted and a proper interface be added. I
don't really care about ls -M.

Joerg