Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: 5.99.42/i386 crash (backtrace + core available)
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:48:47PM +0100, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> Looks like we have
>
> vnode e15c2170, type nullfs with lower vnode df8295c8, type ffs
>
> so here we lookup the lower vnode, need a new one and hit the upper (nullfs)
> vnode. Trying to lock it always has to lock the lower vnode. This is the
> background of ad's comment in vclean
>
> /* XXXAD should not lock vnode under layer */
> mutex_exit(&vp->v_interlock);
> VOP_LOCK(vp, LK_EXCLUSIVE);
>
> I have no idea how to solve this mess...
Yeah, I saw that when I was looking at revoke and had a feeling we
were about to be in for some fun :(
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index