Re: INTx_C/UINTx_C definitions result type

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 11:25:31PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 11:13:26PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 10:11:32PM +0100, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> > > Any drawbacks to be expected with the following patch that adds casts
> > > for the corresponding types ?
> > 
> > If you want to go that route, always add ().
> 
> Ok. While on this one, replace `x ## y' with `__CONCAT(x,y)' ?

I don't feel strong on that, but in this case it might be more
obscuring.

Joerg