Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release

To: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:41:06 +0200

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:12:24AM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> How about adding && !defined(PRIMARY_LOAD_ADDRESS) in bsd.sys.mk?

That seems to be an i386 only thing - we probably want something effectively
catching all -Wl,-Ttext invocations, but the way that is used in
i386/stand/cdboot/Makefile makes it a bit hard.

Should we normalize all occurences to use TEXTADDR and check on that?

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
  - From: Piotr Meyer
- Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
Next by Date: Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
Previous by Thread: Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
Next by Thread: Re: yet another MKPIE=yes problem on build.sh release
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index