Re: ia64 and emap

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Hello,

KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara%kk.iij4u.or.jp@localhost> wrote:
> > Do you have a backtrace?
> 
> Ooops.  We have not implement command 'bt' yet. ;-)
> It will speak information without the meaning...

OK. :)

> > Why do you want to make it global?
> 
> We were able to obtain ubc_nwins and ubc_winshift.  Can we obtain
> uvm_emap_size?

I see, you are using these values to calculate required KVA. However,
is that a long term solution? I think it should be calculated in some
dynamic way (cf. x86 or other pmaps) i.e. it is MD problem, not MI.

For now, I think it is okay to put some workaround, preferably in IA64
pmap, commit your changes, and improve the pmap later.

-- 
Mindaugas