Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 05:49:18AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:13:26AM -0400, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> > > > this way you can use tmpfs over union. this is the only way to get
> > > > tmpfs over union working. i'm using this since a while. it isn't
> > > > documented anywhere.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a good addition to the tmpfs man page. :)
> >
> > And an answer to kern/35112 ?
>
> No, because union mount != unionfs.
At the time of the PR there was no unionfs. The unionfs I talk about
in the PR is mount_union, not mount_unionfs. Back then it didn't make
no difference whether you talked about msdosfs or msdos or unionfs or union...
-Martin
- References:
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
- Re: union mounts, mfs, and newsyslog
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index