Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: our libc included iconv library



In message <20090303155714.GA16691%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
        on Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:57:15 +0100,
        Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 03:45:13PM +0000, Michael Graff wrote:
> > I have added code to only use the output format up to the // mark to libc.  
> > The diff is attached.
> 
> As I said on source-changes -- I strongly object a blind removal of all
> // options.
I also don't agree with removing // options to solve iconv()'s problem.
It dosen't things better, but cause another confusion.

What do you think about it, tshiozak?

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca%back-street.net@localhost>


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index