Re: OpenJDK binaries

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:52:34AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> It is the way the package is built. If the package was constructed differently
> it would be entirely possible. OTOH, ant needs to need the location of a
> java tree in order to work, so you would have to provide it during build
> time anyway.

I'm fine with providing your binaries and a current tree  during bootstrap.
Why would I need an additional outdated version? (Besides the pkg
requiring it, not knowing about the other, newerr version)

Martin