[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: christos-time_t has been merged
On Jan 11, 3:09pm, tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost (Izumi Tsutsui) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: christos-time_t has been merged
| christos%zoulas.com@localhost wrote:
| > Make sure you read UPDATING before you try to update. I am starting a build
| > right now and hopefully it will complete correctly. I would suggest that
| > you wait a couple of days before you upgrade to make sure that I have not
| > missed something critical.
| Maybe libsa sources should be updated?
| I'm afraid 64bit ops might cause bootloader size overflows,
| as 64bit daddr_t.
| I guess time_t in standalone programs is used only to check timeout
| in network code and they require only time difference (not absolute time),
| so it's easier to replace time_t with int (or long)?
int32_t, but it is better to typedef it to something like stand_time_t?
Main Index |
Thread Index |