[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Ideas about an analog-to-digital converter API
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 07:43:33PM -0500, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> - audio(4) is complicated. It has a lot of stuff in it. This complexity
> makes it a lot of work to do what I would think are relatively simple
> A/D operations.
> - It doesn't have the functionality to support the features of some A/D
> converter hardware. E.g, there isn't a way to select the analog input
> range. You could overload some stuff in the current audio interface,
> but it just ... feels awkward.
Actually, audio has a way to set the analog input range: it has input
gain control (multichannel, yet) as part of the mixer interface.
The problem is that nothing in audio(4) is calibrated -- it's all
arbitrary units on the analog side. But that would not be so very
hard to fix!
Thor Lancelot Simon
"Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper
Main Index |
Thread Index |