[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pam-ldap vs. -current
Jeff Rizzo writes:
> Not sure if I should send this to a pkgsrc list instead (which one?),
> but building the security/pam-ldap package under -current results in a
> pam_ldap.so that's missing some critical functions - like
> pam_sm_authenticate(). When built under 4.0, the symbols are there.
> Does this have something to do with having openldap in base? Am I
> missing something blindingly obvious?
Nope.. but there's already a PR on it...
Main Index |
Thread Index |