Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pam-ldap vs. -current

Jeff Rizzo writes:
> Not sure if I should send this to a pkgsrc list instead (which one?),
> but building the security/pam-ldap package under -current results in a
> that's missing some critical functions - like
> pam_sm_authenticate().  When built under 4.0, the symbols are there. 
> Does this have something to do with having openldap in base?  Am I
> missing something blindingly obvious?

Nope.. but there's already a PR on it...


Greg Oster

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index