[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: BNX Double Buffer Allocation
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:35:19PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:24:23PM -0500, David Young wrote:
Drivers for network interfaces reserve many mbufs for receiving
packets, and they are not smart enough to shrink their reservation.
The mbuf can also be in socket queues; if you drop them you're
effectively killing the connection.
I see PR8129, which was closed in 2002 with the comment "Does not happen
with tlp." something either broke along the line, or mbufs could be a
red herring. what else allocates from mclpool?
I ran into this problem on a Dell Blade server with 2 bnx interfaces
when I attempted to use both interfaces. The bnx driver was allocating at
least half the mclpool for each interface, leaving none for any other
uses. I think I was using i386 at the time, later switching to amd64, and
noticed that the default NMBCLUSTERS on amd64 is twice the number as on
I've run into the same problem in the past because I have locally
modified the tlp and elinkx drivers to allocate larger recieve ring
Michael L. Hitch mhitch%montana.edu@localhost
Information Technology Center
Montana State University Bozeman, MT USA
Main Index |
Thread Index |