Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
RAIDframe performance (RAID-5)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just configured a 150GB RAID-5 out of 3 75GB components (one half of
a reasonably modern 160GB disk each). Write performance suck badly. So
I ran bonnie++ on each of
* the RAID-5
* a RAID-1 set made out of the other half of the same three disks (w/
one spare).
* one of the raw disks
Results are basically that RAID-1 and raw disk are comparable at
roughly 40+GB/s read and write each while the RAID-5 has double read
perfomance (that's mostly expected) while only 20% of the write
performance (i.e. < 10GB/s writes). I realise that there's a cost to
having to recompute the parity, but 80% is way more than I expected.
Is this what I should expect or have I fumbled somewhere?
I've used RAIDframe quite extensively before, but usually as RAID-1,
except for one case where I used a RAID-5, but I cannot test the
performance of that one because it broke down recently (I'll get to
that shortly, but in a separate message). But the result is that I
have no RAID-5s to compare performance with.
Regards,
Johan
- ---------------------
Raw bonnie++ results:
RAID5 w/ following parameters:
* START layout
* # sectPerSU SUsPerParityUnit SUsPerReconUnit RAID_level_1
* 128 1 1 5
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
%CP /sec %CP
pear 300M 9802 4 9619 3 7356 2 89596 68 97834 15
468.5 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP /sec %CP
16 453 22 +++++ +++ 1152 4 462 22 2404
99 800 17
pear,300M,9802,4,9619,3,7356,2,89596,68,97834,15,468.5,1,16,453,22,++++
+,+++,1152,4,462,22,2404,99,800,17
RAID1 w/ following parameters:
* START layout
* # sectPerSU SUsPerParityUnit SUsPerReconUnit RAID_level_1
* 128 1 1 1
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
%CP /sec %CP
pear 300M 43556 20 46224 16 15820 4 43234 32 43707 7
424.4 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP /sec %CP
16 702 35 +++++ +++ 2335 9 774 38 2416
99 1596 36
pear,300M,
43556,20,46224,16,15820,4,43234,32,43707,7,424.4,1,16,702,35,+++++,+++,
2335,9,774,38,2416,99,1596,36
Raw disk, no RAIDframe at all:
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
%CP /sec %CP
pear 300M 47866 24 48609 17 22297 7 44870 34 46183 8
305.2 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP /sec %CP
16 932 54 +++++ +++ 3439 25 954 55 2417
99 1973 51
pear,300M,
47866,24,48609,17,22297,7,44870,34,46183,8,305.2,1,16,932,54,+++++,+++,
3439,25,954,55,2417,99,1973,51
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFItEc0KJmr+nqSTbYRAnMiAKCceWaYi9/maEgod9xQThqP9coelgCfefeS
vt6wQCznrHPTqYUIidwwf8s=
=wwdF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index