[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPBL vs. lfs?
Thor Lancelot Simon(tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost) said 2008.08.22 16:54:06 +0000:
> LFS doesn't work in -current so it's basically a moot point. Unless someone
> steps up to adapt it to all the SMP changes in the kernel since 4.0 it may
> never really work again.
Great. What about all of us who actually use LFS where we can?
Main Index |
Thread Index |