[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:52:04PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 1) Is WAPBL considered stable at this point? I realize -current is
> never fully stable, but should I be as willing to risk WAPBL as I
> am to risk -current in general, or should I wait?
It managed to avoid file system checks ...
/export/home: replaying log to disk
/export/share: replaying log to disk
/src: replaying log to disk
/export/scratch: replaying log to disk
... after starting the X.org the second time crashed my system again.
Any brilliant ideas how to teach RAIDframe (ETA for parity rewrite
is 1:28 hours) to perform only limited parity rewrites after a crash?
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |