On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:22:48AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote: > > In principle, a tiny ifconfig binary could load virtually all of its > > syntax from shared objects "just in time." I don't plan to take ifconfig > > in that direction. > > Why? > > I thought that thorpej thought the dynamic way (probably dlopen(3)) is > the way to go. > > My understanding is that if ifconfig(8) can extend dynamically, you > don't need to rebuild ifconfig(8) when you add another protocol (via > kernel module). "One step at a time" ? -- Dan.
Description: PGP signature