Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: immediate v6-related crash wrote:

> I asked before about both the assertion and the use of the header in the
> icmp6 code. The problem here is that the assertion should match the
> check earlier in icmp6_input, but I have no idea why the size doesn't
> match any longer.

Which one?

> It is the same assertion as done in the v4 path.

icmp_input() uses in_cksum() and it doesn't have the assertion,
but I'm not sure which path..
Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index